• Home
  • People
    • Miguel Araújo
    • Lab members
  • Research
    • Projects
      • IberianPonds
      • Iberia Change
        • Data_Iberia
        • Data_Spain
      • Former projects
        • Bioimpacto
          • Summary
          • Goals
          • People
          • Publications
          • Outputs
        • Iberia Gap
          • Summary
          • Goals
          • People
          • Publications
          • Outputs
        • Ecochange
          • Summary
          • Goals
          • People
          • Publications
          • Outputs
        • ALARM
          • Summary
          • Goals
          • People
          • Outputs
            • Data
          • Website
        • MACIS
          • Summary
          • Goals
          • People
          • Publications
          • Outputs
          • Website
  • Publications
  • Consulting
  • Resources
    • Infrastructure
    • Data
    • Software
  • Links
    • Teaching
    • Data
    • Software
  • Blog
  • Contact

Miguel B. Araújo Lab

Predicting the effects of environmental change on biodiversity

You are here: Home / Research Highlights / Standards for data and models in biodiversity assessments

Standards for data and models in biodiversity assessments

  • Science Advances (2019 )
  • Authors: Miguel B. Araújo, Robert P. Anderson, A. Márcia Barbosa, Colin M. Beale, Carsten F. Dormann, Regan Early, Raquel A. Garcia, Antoine Guisan, Luigi Maiorano, Babak Naimi, Robert B. O’Hara, Niklaus E. Zimmermann & Carsten Rahbek
  • Link to article: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaat4858.full

Demand for models in biodiversity assessments is rising, but which models are adequate for the task? We propose a set of best-practice standards and detailed guidelines enabling scoring of studies based on species distribution models for use in biodiversity assessments. We reviewed and scored 400 modeling studies over the past 20 years using the proposed standards and guidelines. We detected low model adequacy overall, but with a marked tendency of improvement over time in model building and, to a lesser degree, in biological data and model evaluation. We argue that implementation of agreed-upon standards for models in biodiversity assessments would promote transparency and repeatability, eventually leading to higher quality of the models and the inferences used in assessments. We encourage broad community participation toward the expansion and ongoing development of the proposed standards and guidelines.

5.0
01

News

  • Dangerous levels of subterranean water consumption
  • Welcome Nuria Galiana
  • Miguel Araújo identified as Highly Cited 2020
  • Biophilia Award to The Guardian
  • FBBVA Biodiversity Conservation Awards - 15th edition

Outreach

  • The future of coastlands in the era of mega hurricanes
  • What will 2021 bring for biodiversity and conservation?
  • Presentation of CORESCAM project
  • Discriminating climate, land‐cover and random effects on species range dynamics
  • Talk to representatives of ministries of CPLP

Opportunities

  • First call AQUACOSM-PLUS
  • La Caixa Foundation PhD studentship on climate change and protected areas
  • Two Post docs: Ecology & Conservation
  • Post-doc: Effects of climate change extremes on Caribbean biodiversity
  • Post doc - Modelling the effects of climate change extremes on Caribbean biodiversity

Research Highlights

The evolution of critical thermal limits of life on Earth

Climate shapes community trophic structures and humans simplify them

The marine fish food web is globally connected

Standards for data and models in biodiversity assessments

The effect of multiple biotic interaction types on species persistence

Books

Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions

Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions

Atlas of Biodiversity Risk

Atlas of Biodiversity Risk

Spatial Conservation Prioritization

Spatial Conservation Prioritization

‹ ›
Visitors:

Copyright © 2021 · Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in